WELL Addenda
WELL Addenda
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Verification type |
Add annotated map as required documentation, remove Architect Letter of Assurance. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add annotated map as required documentation, remove Architect Letter of Assurance. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add Owner Letter of Assurance as required documentation, remove Architect Letter of Assurance. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add Owner Letters of Assurance as required documentation, add on-site spot checks as required verification, remove visual inspections. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add Owner Letters of Assurance as required documentation, add on-site spot checks as required verification, remove visual inspections. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Equivalency |
The Dutch Integral Accessibility Standard is an accepted equivalent for the American Disabilities Act (ADA) design regulations. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the Dutch Integral Accessibility Standard must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the code. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Madrid Technical Building Code for Accessibility is an accepted equivalent for the American Disabilities Act (ADA) design regulations. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the Madrid Technical Building Code for Accessibility must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the code. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Building Requirements for Persons with Disabilities from British Columbia Building Code has been deemed equivalent to the ADA for Feature 72. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the BC Building Code must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the code. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Chinese Code for Accessibility Design (GB50763-2012) is an acceptable equivalent to the American Disabilities Act (ADA) design regulations, with the exception of restrooms. The code must be adapted to provide at least one restroom (or two if located within a single-sex restroom) on each floor. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the code must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the law. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Codi d´Accesibilitat de Catalunya is an acceptable equivalent to the American Disabilities Act (ADA) design regulations. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the code must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the law. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Australian Disability Discrimination Act is an acceptable equivalent to the American Disabilities Act (ADA) design regulations. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the Australian Disability Discrimination Act must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the code. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The French Law 2005-102 regarding PMRs or 'personnes à mobilité réduite' is an acceptable equivalent to the American Disabilities Act (ADA) design regulations. Note, similarly to the application of the ADA to buildings in the US, the code must apply to all buildings. Furthermore, all WELL buildings should be considered "accessible" building for the purposes of the law. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
Replace the existing Part 1 text with the following: The projects demonstrates compliance with one of the following: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
Change the name of the feature from "ADA Accessible Design Standards" to "Accessible Design" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
For Part 3 (Seat Flexibility), alternative seat height adjustability and seat depth adjustability ranges may be accepted if the average height of the expected occupants differs significantly from the average height of the US population. |
06 May, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 2a, change "Adjustable Height standing desks." to "Adjustable height sit-stand desks." |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 3b, delete "or BIFMA G1 guidelines." |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add Owner Letters of Assurance as required documentation, add on-site spot checks as required verification, remove visual inspections. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Noise Rating curve values may be used in lieu of Noise Criterion curve values for the mechanical equipment sound levels required in Part 2 of this feature using the same maximum criteria values listed for each space type. The project team must indicate in their documentation application if Noise Rating is to be used in lieu of Noise Criterion. |
06 May, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 2a, change "Open office spaces and lobbies:" to "Open office spaces and lobbies that are regularly occupied and/or contain workstations:" |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Equivalency |
The Green Star Credit 14 is an accepted equivalent to the requirements of Feature 76: Thermal Comfort. Compliance with the Green Star credit is sufficient to comply with the requirements of Feature 76. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
ISO 7730:2005 and/or CEN Standard EN 15251:2007 may be used in lieu of ASHRAE 55-2003 Sections 5.3 and 5.4. The requirements of these standards must be met in all spaces, rather than 75% of regularly occupied spaces in the project. When selecting either ISO 7730:2005 or CEN Standard EN 15251:2007, the most appropriate standard must be selected for the space. Note that some naturally ventilated spaces may not qualify to use CEN Standard EN 15251:2007 if certain criteria are not met. In addition, when utilizing CEN Standard EN 15251:2007, the project must comply with either Category I or Category II as described in Table A.1 of the standard in order to be within +/- 0.5 of the PMV for the space. |
06 May, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Inquiry: In residential units, are the requirements of Feature 55 met if individual unit controls for heating are provided? Ruling: No, an exemption from ASHRAE 55 requirements may not be granted in residential units if individual unit controls are provided. It is typical for each unit in a multifamily residential development to have individual control over space temperatures with controls allowing occupants to adjust temperatures. In order to rely on the controllability of the systems as an alternative strategy, it must be demonstrated that the local controls allow occupants to set conditions within the unit to meet ASHRAE 55. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Core and Shell projects pursuing WELL compliance may submit Feature 77 as an Innovation feature under Features 101-105, provided all parts of the Feature are met for the whole building scope (i.e. The building core and shell and all parts of the interior finish-out that are completed by the project owner). |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 1b, change "Open office spaces:" to "Open workspaces:" |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 2a, change "Open office spaces:" to "Open workspaces:" |
06 May, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add MEP Letter of Assurance as required documentation, remove Architect Letter of Assurance. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Correction |
For Part 2a, add "interior" in front of "surrounding walls." |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 1a, change "Open office spaces" to "Open workspaces:" |
06 May, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 2b, change "Open office spaces:" to "Open workspaces:" |
06 May, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 2c, change "Cubicle style offices:" to "Partitioned office spaces:" |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add Contractor Letter of Assurance as required documentation. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
In Part 1a, change "The building provides a thermal gradient of at least 3 °C [5 °F] across open office spaces" to "The building provides a thermal gradient of at least 3 °C [5 °F] across open workspaces" |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
In Feature introduction text, change "Additional benefits include saved floor space, lower dust transportation and increased thermal comfort through the separation of temperature controls and fresh air supply systems" to "Additional benefits include saved floor space, lower dust transportation and increased thermal comfort through the separation of temperature controls and outdoor air supply systems |
06 May, 2016 |
Correction |
Change Part 1 name from "Lobbies and Other Common Public Spaces" to "Lobbies and Other Common Spaces" |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Correction |
In feature introduction text, change "Health literacy, defined by the Institute of Medicine as" to "Health literacy, defined by the National Academy of Medicine as" |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Leesman Survey is an accepted alternative to the Occupant Indoor Environmental Quality Survey required for Feature 86, Part 1: Occupant Survey Content. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
(Approved) |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Equivalency |
The Green Star Innovation Challenge: Occupant Engagement is an accepted alternative to the requirements of Feature 86: Post-Occupancy Surveys. Therefore, compliance with the Green Star credit is sufficient to comply with the WELL feature. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add professional narrative as required documentation, remove annotated architectural drawing, remove on-site spot checks. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Part 1 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
The requirements of Part 1b (provide employees with a 50% subsidy on software and/or applications that monitor daytime sleep-related behavior patterns such as activity levels, caffeine and alcohol intake, and eating habits) may be met if employees are provided free, doctor recommended software applications that meet these requirements. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Part 1 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Part 1 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Parts 1, 2, and 3 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Part 1 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Parts 1 and 2 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Verification type |
Under Appendix D, change the feature type for Parts 1 and 2 from "(Protocol)" to "(Organizational Protocol)" |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Verification type |
Add Contractor Letter of Assurance as required documentation, add Owner Letter of Assurance as required documentation. |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
A corporate annual report may be used to meet the requirements of Part 1 (Transparency Program Participation) if it meetings the following requirements:
|
06 May, 2016 |
Correction |
In feature description language, change the last sentence from "This feature uses JUST participation to support fair and equitable organizations" to "This feature uses JUST participation and G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines to support fair and equitable organizations." |
10 Feb, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Intent |
In the Feature description, remove the second paragraph. Replace with the following text: |
24 Oct, 2016 |