WELL Addenda
WELL ADDENDA
Review the complete list of addenda changes made to the WELL Building Standard.
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 25 May, 2023 For WELL v1 projects, Feature 01, Part 1 Standards for Volatile Substances and Part 2 Standards for Particulate Matter and Inorganic Gases may be replaced with WELL v2 Feature A01 Part 1: Meet Thresholds for Particulate Matter, Part 2: Meet Thresholds for Organic Gases and Part 3: Meet Thresholds for Inorganic Gases. The PV Submittal Template for v2 should be used by Performance Testing Agents to report Feature A01.1-A01.3 thresholds. |
25 May, 2023 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 May, 2020 To utilize the following AAP, projects must meet the following requirements: Projects that meet the requirements above may use the following thresholds in lieu of those listed in Part 2: A project using this AAP is limited to Silver level certification. |
27 May, 2020 |
Type | Description | Post Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 Updated:
|
27 Apr, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 09 Feb, 2017 Projects located in areas where annual average ambient PM2.5 levels are 35 µg/m³ or higher may utilize one of the following alternative strategies to satisfy Part 2. |
09 Feb, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 31 Jul, 2019 To utilize the following AAP for Feature 02, projects must be either: During performance verification, one of the sampling points for Feature 01 will be 2–5 m [6.6–16.4 ft] meters from the door to the smoking room and the door will be opened at least once every ten minutes during the testing period. For Feature 02, Part 2, project may have outdoor smoking areas (e.g., on a roof or patio), provided that these areas are at least 8 m [26 ft] from outdoor air intakes and operable windows. There must be at least two regularly closed doors (or one revolving door) between the smoking area and any regularly occupied interior space for any entries within 8 m [26 ft] of outdoor smoking area. Project must include an identical (or superior) outdoor area where smoking is banned at least 20 m [66 ft] from any other outdoor area where smoking is allowed. A project using this AAP is limited to Silver level certification, unless it: In addition to original documentation, an architectural drawing must be provided which indicates location, entrances, and wall construction of smoking area. Furthermore, the MEP engineer must provide a Letter of Assurance that the ventilation and pressurization requirements are met. Proper signage must be posted at the entrance to the smoking area and is subject to a spot check during performance review. |
31 Jul, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 May, 2020 To utilize the following AAP, projects seeking to use natural ventilation to meet Part 1 must meet the following requirements: Then project may use the Natural Ventilation Procedure (as described in ASHRAE 62.1-2013) for determining ventilation compliance in Part 1 without first determining the quality of the outdoor air. A project using this AAP is limited to Silver level certification. |
27 May, 2020 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Multifamily residential projects may achieve Feature 03, Part 4 by ventilating lobbies and corridors via infiltration from pressurized dwelling units rather than dedicated supply air. Infiltration into these spaces must meet or exceed 0.3 L/s/m². |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 29 May, 2018 Where projects are restricted from implementing a demand-controlled ventilation system or are unable to retrofit the existing ventilation system to be demand-controlled, the requirements of Feature 03 Part 2 may be met through the following conditions for outdoor air supply rate, whichever is more stringent: |
29 May, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may use custom-made furniture that contain composite wood panels not tested using the CDPH v. 1.1-2010 or ANSI/BIFMA M7.1-2011 standard methods, as long as the composite wood manufacturer meets the ‘Formaldehyde emissions evaluation’ criterium of the ‘Low-Emitting Materials’ credit of the LEED v4.1 standard, or meet one of the following: US EPA TSCA Title VI, Europe E1, Japan Four-star. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 For Feature 4, Part 5, as an alternative to the formaldehyde emissions thresholds cited in ANSI/BIFMA e3-2011 7.6.2, projects may use certain approved thresholds. For systems furniture laminates: CDPH Standard Method v1.1-2010 limits (9 ug/m3) may be used. For furniture substrates: CARB Phase II limits (50 ppb for hardwood plywood with veneer core, 50 ppb for hardwood plywood with composite core, 90 ppb for particleboard, 110 ppb for medium density fiberboard, and 113 ppb for thin medium density fiberboard) may be used. Additionally, note that the project will still be required to demonstrate Feature 01: Air Quality Standards. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Field and Laboratory Emission Cell (FLEC) emissions testing is approved as an emissions testing methodology ONLY for furniture and furnishings that are made up of a uniform material and have flat testing surfaces on which the FLEC emissions testing methodology may be applied. For example, flat surfaced cabinetry that is made up of a uniform material may be tested using this methodology. However, chairs that are made from a variety of materials that lack flat surfaces may not be tested using this methodology. The emissions test must be administered by a third party investigator with no affiliation with the project. The associated costs are the responsibility of the project team. Additional tests performed in accordance with ISO 16000 methodology must be performed for total aldehydes and 4-Phenylcyclohexane and must meet the thresholds specified in the WELL Building Standard. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Multifamily residential projects may achieve Feature 5, Part 1 by providing subsidized rental of purification systems to tenants via a discounted rental rate of the dwelling unit. Project teams must demonstrate that the discounted rent is lower than the market value of the dwelling unit and that the difference will cover the rental of air purification devices. Tenants are required to sign an agreement for purchasing or leasing air purifier(s) in order to receive the discounted rate. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 In a project with a split-system air conditioning unit that does not allow for accommodating MERV 13 filters, the following measures may be implemented as an alternative. For Parts 1 and 2a of this feature, a standalone air purifier with carbon filter and HEPA filter performing equivalent to MERV 17-20 may be used in accordance with manufacturer’s guidelines. Installation of the HEPA filters may not be conditional based on the criteria in Part 2b. A sufficient quantity of stand-alone air purifiers and carbon filters and HEPA filters must be provided in accordance with the manufacturers recommended area coverage. Provide a policy document to confirm Part 3 of this Feature, and a policy document that confirms that the project owner will maintain and replace the filters and filter units located within the project as per manufacturer specifications. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 Projects unable to provide additional space for carbon filters may instead educate future tenants on their ability to buy and install stand-alone air purifiers with carbon filters. The project team must provide a letter signed by the project owner to confirm that if required for WELL certification in the future, the project owner will buy and install the air purifiers with filters on behalf of the tenant. It must be demonstrated that adequate wall space is accommodated to install wall-mounted air purifiers. The WELL Performance Testing Agent will confirm the available wall space and examine a copy of all the information given to tenants during the project’s Performance Verification. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 In lieu of installing rack space for future carbon filters, an execution plan for future modifications to the HVAC system to create rack space for carbon filters may be provided in the event that the installation of carbon filters is a requirement of the WELL Building Standard in the future. To follow this approach, it must be confirmed that the system would be able to physically accept carbon filters should the necessary rack space be created, the plan must identify the cost estimates of renovating the HVAC system to include the necessary rack space to confirm that it is considered a capital improvement item, and the owner must commit to making the upgrades should the WELL Building Standard require carbon filters in a future recertification of the project. |
06 May, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Multifamily Residential projects may use wall-mounted HEPA filters to meet the requirements of Feature 5 Parts 1 and 2, provided the project contains a sufficient quantity of wall mounted HEPA filters in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommended area coverage. In addition, a policy document must be provided confirming Part 3 of the Feature and that the Owner will maintain the filters for the units that are located in both common and private areas. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 As an alternative to the quarterly inspection of cooling coils required in Feature 6, Part 1b, projects may sample 25% of the project’s cooling coils per quarter (representative of all building orientations and equal to 100% of cooling coils per year) through either visual inspection or performance inspection tests. Policy documentation must be provided that includes a detailed description of the inspection protocols for cooling coils and drain pans, and confirming that cleaning will be provided if mold is found before the annual inspection. The inspection and analyses must be performed in accordance with ISO 16000-18 and ISO 16000-17. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 05 Nov, 2020 Projects may achieve Feature 08, Part 1 by developing and using a comprehensive floor cleaning plan at entrances which details the cleaning products and equipment that will be used to clean various surfaces on a daily basis. In lieu of the original feature verification method, project teams submit a professional narrative which specifies cleaning products and equipment, protocols for post-inclement weather situations and a checklist with daily tasks that are completed at least two times per day. |
05 Nov, 2020 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 For projects that have an entryway walk off system that is less than 10 feet in length, but no smaller than 9’6’’, temporary rollout mats may be used during potential inclement weather (i.e. a 30% chance or higher) to bring the walk-off system up to 10 feet in length. In addition, projects must commit to cleaning the entrance/lobby multiple times daily, and demonstrate this through a cleaning plan. Provide the cleaning plan as well as a narrative detailing the project policy regarding rollout mats and inclement weather. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 Projects may create a healthy space by installing stand-alone air filters in the breathing zone near the primary seating of occupants, and near the entrance. A narrative must be included with documentation to describe the contaminants that will be filtered out along with an operations schedule for the maintenance of the air filters. Note that this AAP meets both Parts of the Feature. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 The requirements of Part 2 (Entryway Seal) may be met by controlling building pressure according to the following requirements: - An indoor pressure sensor must be installed in the building lobby and near any other entrance to the building from the outside. The pressure sensor must be capable of providing automatic readings on a frequency of at least one per hour. To document this alternative path, the project team must provide the following in the documentation application submission: |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 Projects registered as New and Existing Interiors that can demonstrate that aspects of the base building operation is outside of their control are not required to achieve Feature 09, Part 1: Cleaning Plan for Occupied Spaces. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Projects in China may use the following asbestos inspection, management and post-remediation clearance requirements in lieu of those required in Feature 11, Part 3. a) Inspection requirements b) Asbestos management plan c) Post-abatement clearance |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 Projects may meet Feature 11 Part 1 by complying with requirements for maximum concentration values for toxic chemicals tolerated by weight in homogenous materials as required by European Union’s Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS). |
15 Aug, 2018 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 29 May, 2018 All newly installed building materials meet the following materials composition requirements:
Wherever procurement of a product or a material type is not possible, the project is permitted to submit documentation demonstrating an attempt has been made, including a petition or formal request filed with at minimum three manufacturers (per product or material type) who were unable to meet their needs. |
29 May, 2018 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 29 May, 2018 Asbestos Content and Advocacy
Lead Content
Lead Advocacy
Lead Disclosure |
29 May, 2018 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 05 Feb, 2018 Complex electrical or data products that are made up entirely of small electrical components, such as fire alarms, meters, sensors, thermostats and load break switches, may meet the European Union’s Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive in lieu of the 100 ppm limit on added lead in Feature 11 Part 1c. RoHS establishes the following maximum concentration values for chemicals by weight in homogeneous materials: |
05 Feb, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 17, Part 1 by using printers and plotters that are not low-emission in occupied rooms (rather than being "closed from adjacent spaces") so long as there is an exhaust fan above the printer and they are used for on average less than 1,000 pages per month. |
01 May, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 The requirements of Part 3 (Environmental Measures Display) may be met by hosting the required data on a website accessible to occupants and in locations where the physical display would be located, placing signage indicating the website where the data may be accessed. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 For Feature 19, Part 1, a dedicated outdoor terrace can be provided. The terrace must satisfy the following requirements: |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 To fulfill Feature 19, Part 1, projects may provide operable windows to 95% of the regularly occupied spaces (by floor area) in the office, provided that regularly occupied spaces, which do not have windows, have larger doorways to allow fresh air in, when open. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 22, Part 1 by using uncovered trashcans if they are located directly underneath paper towel dispensers and at least one closed trashcan is additionally provided to collect waste other than paper towels. This does not apply to trashcans located in areas where food is prepared and stored (e.g., kitchens, pantries, etc.) as these recepticles must be closed to avoid pests. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 22, Part 1 by using existing cabinetry with built-in open trash receptacles so long as they are emptied and inspected for pests on a daily basis and additional pest management procedures be incorporated (e.g., tolerance and action threshold, specific response times, and evaluation/record keeping). Should pests eventually become an issue, the project commits to providing lids at trash receptacles immediately. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 In bathrooms, projects may use garbage or recycling cans without lids that are designated for only paper towels so long as there are nearby garbage cans that meet the feature requirements. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 When desk bins are used to comply with Feature 22, Part 1, Requirement b, waste must be emptied at least once per day. Bins must be lined with appropriate liners (e.g. biodegradable liners for the compost bin) that will sufficiently retain all waste and waste residue. Bins must be wiped to remove waste residue when present or at least weekly. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Inquiry: For Part 1b, our garbage cans are integrated into casework. The casework has a 6 inch opening at the top for users to insert waste. The garbage is collected from the garbage cans daily to minimize the time that waste remains in the garbage cans. Will this design meet the requirements of Part 1b? Ruling: No, the design as described is not approved. The openings are large enough to allow pests to gain access to the garbage and allow for discarded trash to fall outside the garbage receptacle within the casework. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 Projects that wish to include a gas range within the project scope must provide range hoods with increased exhaust efficiency in order to exhaust combustion byproducts. The range hood must provide at least 100 cubic feet per minute of exhaust air for every 10,000 BTU’s of burner output. If the burner output is unknown or cannot be guaranteed, then the range hood should provide a minimum of 600 cubic feet per minute of exhaust air. In addition, the range hood shall be exhausted directly to the outdoors. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 Projects may meet Feature 26 Part 1 through the application of REACH Optimization. Specifically, use of furnishings, built-in furniture, interior finishes and finish materials that document their material ingredient optimization for at least 25% (by cost) via the following paths:
|
15 Aug, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37, which must be met per “Appendix I: Core & Shell Scope”. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Core and Shell Projects located in China and member countries of ASEAN may provide at least one drinking water dispenser on every floor located within 30 meters of the entrances to leased spaces, instead of providing water that meets the thresholds in these features to the leased spaces or granting fiscal allowances to tenants to obtain drinking water of similar quality. Note that application of this AAP will preclude achievement of Feature 36 and Feature 37. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 For regularly occupied spaces that are not within 30 meters (100 feet) of a drinking water station, pitchers of filtered water and glasses may be provided that are monitored and refilled through the day. The Operations Schedule for the project must include information regarding the provision (location and quantities) of water and the monitoring and refilling of pitchers if this strategy is used. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Retail projects may achieve Feature 39, Part 1 by using strategic placement, education and advertising to direct customers toward healthier choices in place of refined ingredient restrictions on available products. Photographic verification of product placement and/or display as well as signage (educational or advertising) is required during performance review. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 20 Oct, 2017 For projects that have an existing food and beverage contract in place and are not able to comply with the requirements of Part 1 or Part 2, the following requirements are met: Project teams that seek to use this strategy must submit evidence of an existing contractual agreement and are subject to an on-site visual inspection by the WELL Performance Testing Agent. |
20 Oct, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 31 Jul, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 40, Part 1 by creating and implementing a system to label food allergens to indicate the presence of food allergens in foods and beverages. The labeling system must include, at minimum, the food allergens listed in Feature 40 Part 1. Signage explaining how the labeling system operates is prominently displayed at point-of-decision and the complete list of allergens found in foods and beverages is available upon request. Signage is subject to a spot check during performance review. |
31 Jul, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 For Feature 40 Part 1, in lieu of allergen labelling, projects may have food allergen experts on their staff. All kitchen, cafeteria, or similar staff should have the option to participate in allergen training at no cost and at least one trained staff member must be present at all shifts. In addition, point-of-decision signage must be present to prompt individuals to report any potential allergies to staff. As part of the Documentation Review, projects should provide an example certificate of completion for staff members who have completed the food allergy training. Signage is subject to a spot check during performance review. |
15 Aug, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 31 Jul, 2019 Projects may use contactless soap dispensers so long as the soap container is both detachable and refillable and the following conditions are met: |
31 Jul, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects unable to replace existing sinks with those meeting height and area requirements of Feature 41, Part 3 may retain the existing fixtures and meet the intent of the feature if the following conditions are met: In lieu of original documentation requirements, projects must submit a narrative describing significant hardship, such as financial and/or schedule implications, for renovating the non-compliant sinks to meet the requirements of Feature 41 Part 3. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 41, Part 1 by using cotton towels of the roll type in place of disposable paper towels at all sink locations. These towels must be changed at least once a week and washed before reuse. This AAP cannot be used in healthcare facilities. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Projects may use hand soaps containing fragrance to meet Feature 41 Part 1 under the following conditions: |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 02 Jan, 2019 Hand dryers equipped with HEPA-compliant filters may be used in lieu of paper towels for hand drying in non-healthcare WELL projects to meet Feature 41 Part 1. Cleaning, maintenance and filter replacement should be scheduled as set by manufacturer’s recommendations. Documentation of such activities must be maintained. |
02 Jan, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 As an alternative to Feature 41 Part 3, projects with existing sinks that are not undergoing renovation may be allowed a 1 inch flexibility range in meeting the sink column of water dimensions. Projects must commit to purchasing compliant sinks during next renovation or upgrade. |
15 Aug, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 43, Part 1 by using a food labeling system that clearly identifies whether or not products contain artificial ingredients. The labeling system must include, at minimum, the artificial ingredients listed in Feature 43 Part 1. Signage explaining how the labeling system operates is prominently displayed at point-of-decision and the complete list of artificial ingredients found in foods provided on-site is available upon request. Signage is subject to a spot check during performance review. |
01 May, 2019 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 For projects located in India, the requirements for Feature 43 may be met by providing labeling for all high-shelf life packaged foods in addition to freshly prepared food items offered on-site. Foods must be labeled with the additives outlined by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). Up to 30% of the low-shelf life packages goods prepared off site may be exempted from artificial substance labeling, but must include clear signage that they have not been evaluated for artificial ingredients or food additives. The latest version of the FSSAI regulation must be made available to building users upon request. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 44, Part 1 by displaying nutritional information for non-packaged foods and beverages on a list of primary ingredients which is clearly displayed (per meal or item) at point-of-decision on packaging, menus or signage. If information is displayed on a digital resource, signage is present at point-of-decision to direct individuals to the digital resource. Signage is subject to a spot check during performance review. |
01 May, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 26 Jul, 2017 For projects that prepare foods on site from raw ingredients, which are not able to comply with the requirements of Part 1, the project may offer point-of-decision prompts in lieu of labeling. The prompts must be based on a ranking system that encourages the consumption of nutritionally-dense foods. Food prompts must be clearly displayed and must be used in conjunction with a food advertising and/or messaging campaign that allows individuals to quickly and easily identify nutritious foods and beverages. An explanation of the ranking system must be made available to all occupants. The ranking system will be verified by the WELL Reviewer at the documentation review. All strategies should comply with best practices and/or dietary guidelines and be supported by existing scientific, medical, or industry research. Please note that all foods offered will still need to comply with Feature 39 Processed foods. |
26 Jul, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 05 Feb, 2018 Projects may meet requirements outlined in Part 1b by zoning the space into banks according to proximity to windows or corresponding to location of departments even if the areas differ from those prescribed in Part 1b. |
05 Feb, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 Projects pursuing option a, in place of a letter of assurance and on-site spot checks as indicated in the Performance Verification Guidebook, may provide an annotated floor plan which identifies a subset of workstations that comprise at least 75% of the total number present on site. During Performance Verification, the WELL Performance Testing Agent will restrict sampling to these workstations, and compliance with this feature will be based on 100% of samples equaling or exceeding 200 equivalent melanopic lux. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 To increase the delivered Equivalent Melanopic Lux and fulfill Feature 54, projects may provide task or other supplemental lighting at workstations upon request. Projects choosing to pursue this option must demonstrate that they have sufficient funding to procure task or other supplemental lighting for at least 75% of the total workstations within the WELL boundary. Projects must also provide comprehensive education to employees that focuses on the benefits of task or other supplemental lighting and circadian lighting overall. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 The following glare control strategies may be used in lieu of glare requirements for atriums. Project teams may submit a plan or narrative detailing the use of a combination of the following: glare reducing film that has a solar transmittance of 10% or less, space planning to ensure workstations are set back from atrium spaces by at least 7 feet, and building orientation to reduce solar glare. Project teams must demonstrate that occupant comfort is not impacted. |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Monitors with adjustable monitor arms that allow the occupant to move the computer screens to face within a 20 degree perpendicular to the plane of the nearest window may be used to meet the requirements of Part 1a (Glare Avoidance). |
06 May, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Inquiry: Can “free address” workstations, allowing occupants to change workstations to avoid glare, be used to meet the feature requirements? Ruling: No, free address workstations may not be used to meet the feature requirements. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 20 Oct, 2017 In transient areas, light sources with CRI of 80 and R9 of 15 may be used. Light sources used in regularly occupied areas must meet the requirements of Feature 58 as written. |
20 Oct, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Multi-Family Residential projects may achieve Feature 59 Part 2 and 3 by providing multi-level dimmable lighting for all ambient lighting in bedrooms and living areas. In addition, shades must be provided in both the bedroom and living areas, as follows: |
01 May, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Inquiry: Can a daylighting analysis confirming that at least 90% of regularly occupied spaces have sufficient daylight illumination levels (at least 30 footcandles) and that 100% of spaces have access to quality outdoor views be used to meet the feature requirements? Ruling: No, a daylighting simulation combined with access to quality views may not be utilized to meet the feature requirements. The intent of Feature 61 is to include proximity to windows, outdoor views, and daylight in indoor spaces. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 To meet Feature 62 Part 1, Daylight Modeling, complete the following: |
01 May, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 Projects may meet the requirements of Feature 62 Part 1b by using the results of daylight modeling to identify and install shading systems to allow the appropriate amount of light into the space. Note that the daylight modeling report submitted must take into account the shades to calculate the light levels in the space during the course of the day. |
15 Aug, 2018 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 As an alternative to a lighting simulation to determine the sDA of the space, project teams may use the LEED v4 BD+C EQ Daylight Credit (Option 2 or Option 3) requirements to fulfill the requirement. The provided lighting analysis document must be updated to demonstrate that 90% for Option 2 or 75% for Option 3 of the regularly occupied floor area meets the requirements (i.e., at least 2 points under LEED v4 BD+C EQ Daylight credit). |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Inquiry: Can an automatic shading system that draws shades when sensors indicate that daylight can contribute to glare at workstations be used in lieu of meeting the feature requirements? Ruling: No, the installation of automated shading devices alone does not meet the feature requirements, as this feature requires demonstration that as a result of the overall lighting design, the project is able to achieve the proper amount of daylighting. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 05 Feb, 2018 Projects with more than one staircase that meets the requirements of Part 1 and Part 3 of this feature may use a staircase less than 1.4 m wide to comply with Part 2c. |
05 Feb, 2018 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 Projects that have significantly progressed through or have completed development, design, and/or planning processes may be exempt from Part 2 and may still achieve credit for this feature if achieving Parts 1 and 3. Projects pursuing this AAP are required to submit documentation that demonstrates significant hardship, such as financial or scheduling implications, in order to be exempt from Part 2. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Staircases located in residential units may be exempt from meeting the requirements of Part 2c (stair width set at a minimum of 1.4m [56 in] between handrails). |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 Nov, 2018 (Approved) |
01 Nov, 2018 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 Updated: Existing (Removed): |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 Updated: Existing (Removed): |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 As an alternative to one of the activity incentives provided under Feature 65, Part 1: Activity Incentive Programs, projects may create company sponsored sports teams, provided the sports teams are selected by the employees and the owner will accommodate similar incentives for alternatives upon employee request. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 26 Jul, 2017 Projects may use Option 1. Surround Density of the LEED BD+C Surrounding density and diverse uses Credit to comply with Part 3: Neighborhood Connectivity. Documentation must demonstrate that the project is located on a site where the surrounding density within 400 m [1/4 mi] of the project boundary has a minimum combined density of at least 5,050 m²/acre [22,000 ft²/hectare] of buildable land, a minimum residential density of 7 dwelling units (DU) per acre [17.5 DU/hectare], or a minimum nonresidential density (FAR) of 0.5. |
26 Jul, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 For Feature 68, Part 1, project teams may utilize a shared gym or similar physical activity space located within 200 m [650 ft] of the WELL project boundary. These spaces must be available for complimentary use by occupants. The project is required to submit documentation demonstrating that the space has adequate capacity for the project population, in addition to any other population that this shared amenity supports. Note: This ruling is specifically for Feature 68 and Feature 70. Compliance with other related features such as Feature 65 and Feature 66 is not implied. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 26 Jul, 2017 Projects may include bike share docking stations toward the bike storage requirements of this feature. The docks must meet the same proximity requirements listed in the feature. The project must provide a minimum of 1 storage space for privately owned bicycles, with at least 1 additional storage space for every 6 bike share docks. |
26 Jul, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 For Feature 70, project teams may utilize a shared gym or similar physical activity space located within 200 m [650 ft] of the WELL project boundary. These spaces must be available for complimentary use by occupants. The project is required to submit documentation demonstrating that the space has adequate capacity for the project population, in addition to any other population that this shared amenity supports. Note: This ruling is specifically for Feature 68 and Feature 70. Compliance with other related features such as Feature 65 and Feature 66 is not implied. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 For Feature 73, Part 2, the project may provide height adjustable tables and meeting tables apart from workstation desks to meet the feature requirements. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Apr, 2017 For Feature 73, Part 2, the project may provide a lower threshold of the required initial percentage of sit/stand workstations required by the feature, in conjunction with a future purchase commitment and an educational campaign. The campaign must encourage walking during the working day and highlight the benefits of sit-stand desks. The project must also provide instructions to occupants on how to request a sit-stand desk. The project must provide sit-stand desks in multiple options/styles (for trial use by occupants) and commit to accommodate all occupant requests for a sit-stand desk, even in exceedance of the feature requirement. |
27 Apr, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 For Feature 73, Part 3, alternative seat height adjustability and seat depth adjustability ranges may be accepted if the average height of the expected occupants differs significantly from the average height of the US population. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 09 Feb, 2017 Whereas Noise Criteria levels within a space is driven by sound produced by the HVAC and other mechanical systems which may be outside of a tenant’s control, New and Existing Interiors projects may achieve Feature 75 when achieving NC levels higher than listed, with the following conditions: |
09 Feb, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Noise Rating curve values may be used in lieu of Noise Criterion curve values for the mechanical equipment sound levels required in Part 2 of this feature using the same maximum criteria values listed for each space type. The project team must indicate in their documentation application if Noise Rating is to be used in lieu of Noise Criterion. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 27 Oct, 2021 As part of documentation submission, projects may optionally submit design values for clothing insulation (CLO) and metabolic rate (MET) which will be used in calculations to determine compliance of performance testing results. Projects may submit multiple CLO and MET values which may vary by time of year. |
27 Oct, 2021 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 09 Feb, 2017 Multifamily residential projects may certify when not supplying central-system air conditioning or air conditioning units for cooling in individual dwelling units, with the following conditions: |
09 Feb, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 17 Jan, 2017 Residential projects may fulfill the requirements of Feature 76 by providing a narrative of how the residential units meet local thermal comfort standards (environmental factors: air temperature, humidity, radiant temperature, air speed and personal factors: metabolic rate and clothing insulation) or by providing an allowance for tenants to select an air conditioning unit of their choice from options, which would allow the unit to meet the thermal comfort requirements. |
17 Jan, 2017 |
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 Inquiry: In residential units, are the requirements of Feature 76 met if individual unit controls for heating are provided? Ruling: No, an exemption from ASHRAE 55 requirements may not be granted in residential units if individual unit controls are provided. It is typical for each unit in a multifamily residential development to have individual control over space temperatures with controls allowing occupants to adjust temperatures. In order to rely on the controllability of the systems as an alternative strategy, it must be demonstrated that the local controls allow occupants to set conditions within the unit to meet ASHRAE 55. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 24 Oct, 2016 Core and Shell projects pursuing WELL compliance may submit Feature 77 as an Innovation feature under Features 101-105, provided all parts of the Feature are met for the whole building scope (i.e. The building core and shell and all parts of the interior finish-out that are completed by the project owner). |
24 Oct, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 To meet the requirements of Feature 82 Part 1 and 2, projects may implement the following strategies:
|
15 Aug, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 15 Aug, 2018 As an alternative to Feature 83 Part 1, projects may use active chilled beams that integrate outdoor air supply, so long as the following conditions are met:
|
15 Aug, 2018 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 The requirements of Part 1b (provide employees with a 50% subsidy on software and/or applications that monitor daytime sleep-related behavior patterns such as activity levels, caffeine and alcohol intake, and eating habits) may be met if employees are provided free, doctor recommended software applications that meet these requirements. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 01 May, 2019 Projects may achieve Feature 96, Part 2 if the organization demonstrates that it commits to donate to registered charities within the area local to the project. Note that, although the extent of employee involvement can vary, organizations should encourage employee participation in the charitable donation process, including employee donations supplementing office donations. |
01 May, 2019 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 06 May, 2016 A corporate annual report may be used to meet the requirements of Part 1 (Transparency Program Participation) if it meetings the following requirements: 1. The report includes information on each of the 22 JUST indicators (as applicable) as they apply to the organization as a whole, and areas where the organizational policies can be improved. 2. The report is publically available and employees are clearly made aware of how to access the report. |
06 May, 2016 |
Type | Description | Post Date |
---|---|---|
Alternative Adherence Path |
Type: Alternative Adherence Path
Post Date: 26 Jul, 2017 For kitchens that are no more than 3 m [10 ft] in any direction, the project team may use a ceiling height of 2.5 m [8.2 ft] in the kitchens. |
26 Jul, 2017 |